![]() ![]() If I was in the market again I'd go with whatever one had the best price.Recently, I bought a Viltrox EF-M2 II and a Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 for my Panasonic GH5, but when I attach the lens to the adapter, it doesn't fit completely, it stays halfway and doesn't lock onto the adapter. 64x did vignette a bit with ultra wide lenses like the 11-16 Tokina, so if you're doing a lot of ultra wide stuff you might get annoyed with it. ![]() Not only that but it also ads one stop of light to the Sigma, so the aperture becomes f/1.2 With the Metabones this lens is a beast in low light. 71x was better if you wanted more reach out of your lenses. The popular combination makes the Sigma 18-35mm have a field-of-view of approximately 25-50mm when compared to a full-frame equivalent. 64x was nice if you wanted to shoot wider stuff or were dying for that extra touch of low light, the. In this video I explain the difference between both and which one works better with th. I wouldn't trust auto focus on either setup really, and don't expect any adapter to work flawlessly 100% of the time, but in my experience with them you do get more consistent performance when you pay for a Metabones.Ä«etween the. GH5 with Speedbooster XL and Ultra comparison with Sigma 18-35mm f1.8. Without the lens mounted to the camera (lens not getting power), if you turn the focus ring, you can see the glass element in the lens moving. Ive read that the most common filter size would be 77mm, and the best thing for future-proofing would be to get that and use a step-up ring for the Sigma 18-35. BUT they are near impossible to get working on other MFT cams like the BMPCC4K and Z Cam E2, which sucks if you ever switch systems or find yourself using one of those for a bit. The 18-35 most definitely isn't a focus by wire lens. Hi all, I recently joined the GH5 + Viltrox EF-M2 + Sigma 18-35 Club and Im now looking to invest in some filters (ND, Circular polariser, maybe a cheeky black pro-mist 1/8). 18 19 20 21 22 01 751 09 04 US2 Tribol 1100/220 Optigear BM 220 Renolin Jan. This was filmed to show the lowlight capabilities of the came. That being said the Viltrox work, and they work very well for the money on a Panasonic. Sigma 18 35 + GH5 Autofocus test Avp Studios 13.3K subscribers Subscribe 20 2.7K views 4 years ago Here I check out the excellent Sigma 18-35 Art lens with the Metabones adaptor on the. Here is a sample of the Panasonic GH5 with the metabones ultra 0.71x and sigma 18-35 f1.8 lens. ![]() Metabones don't fringe and glow wide open like Viltrox do, they adapt to BMPCCs, Z Cams, and Panasonics properly, they don't have to be adjusted to properly find infinity focus, have somewhat usable continuous auto focus, and they're built way better (no wiggle in lens and camera connection). I cant imagine needing any more image stabilization than what I currently get with the GH5/Sigma combo. I have used that lens handheld in so many situations where I would normally use a tripod without question. I had 2 Viltrox for about a year before getting one Metabones, and then a 2nd, owned all 4 adapters together for about 2 years and you can tell the difference. Ive never used the Panasonic 18-35, but I can say that the image stabilization with the Sigma is much, much better than I expected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |